I would highly recommend this printer to all. Copy photos, black and white or color documents with the touch of one button. Lexmark printer I Already have Lexmark printer’s this one came with a paper jam and it took me a while to find the problem. But if your focus is on print quality, check out the Canon Pixma MP I absolutely love this printer. We can’t see this device remaining in one piece for long under heavy office conditions. The lowest-priced item in unused and unworn condition with absolutely no signs of wear.
|Date Added:||22 January 2015|
|File Size:||40.32 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Show More Show Less. The item may be a factory second or a new, unused item with defects or irregularities. We’ve changed, we promise.
Casual home users who value network-readiness will love that feature, but users who want better print quality will be happier with a different machine. The HP Photosmart C was the next slowest, but still nearly doubled the pace with a score of 0. The X’s text print quality left a lot to be desired cajon our tests. If you’re a casual home user who prioritizes network-readiness, the Lexmark X is a bargain. Photo prints were similarly tardy, especially when switching to Lexmark’s optional photo cartridge for a six-ink line-up.
Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. Save on Printers Trending price is based on prices over last 90 days. Even replacing these with high capacity cartridges only brings the cost down to 3.
The Bad Text, graphics, and photo printing need improvement; very slow 4×6 photo prints. It is very easy to use and works better than any other printer I have owned.
However i dislike the idea that it does not fax. Black text tended toward dark gray rather than true black. But it scored a slow 1. Show less Show more. The X is also rated to perform more quickly than the X, so the focus this review will be on performance since the two printers are so similar otherwise.
HP Photosmart C 8. Details need to be sharpened, and we saw evidence of graininess and horizontal striations, though they weren’t as evident as what we saw in the graphics prints.
But if your focus is on print quality, check out the Canon Pixma MP The 4×6 photo print was also just OK. See details for description of any imperfections. For Wi-Fi Quick mono printing.
The Lexmark X is a high-end version of the X, which we reviewed recently. The X did its best work with the cabon scan: I would highly recommend this printer to all.
CNET Labs’ inkjet multifunction speed tests pages per minute Longer bars indicate better performance.
The XP “Small-in-One” printer turns in high scores for print quality, a versatile Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook’s Canon Pixma MP 5. Considering that Lexmark is such a big name in the world of business printing, the X feels surprisingly flimsy, with a build quality that doesn’t seem to match the competition. We can’t see this device remaining in one piece for long under heavy office conditions. Best Printers for Our Verdict Wi-Fi is nice, but printing is poor.